Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(6): e073038, 2023 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37355267

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) caused by an ischaemic mechanism is common and is associated with adverse short-term and long-term prognoses. However, MINS is a recent concept, and few studies have prospectively used it as a primary outcome. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a non-invasive procedure that induces innate cardioprotection and may reduce MINS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled, observer-blinded trial. Patients with a high clinical risk of cardiovascular events who are scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery will be enrolled. A total of 766 participants will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive RIPC or control treatment before anaesthesia. RIPC will comprise four cycles of cuff inflation for 5 min to 200 mm Hg and deflation for 5 min. In the controls, an identical-looking cuff will be placed around the arm but will not be actually inflated. The primary outcome will be MINS, defined as at least one postoperative cardiac troponin (cTn) concentration above the 99th percentile upper reference limit of the cTn assay as a result of a presumed ischaemic mechanism. This trial will test the concentration of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). The secondary outcomes will be hs-cTnT levels reaching/above the prognostically important thresholds, peak hs-cTnT and total hs-cTnT release during the initial 3 days after surgery, length of hospital stay after surgery, length of stay in the intensive care unit, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac-related death, all-cause death within 30 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery, and postoperative complications and adverse events within 30 days after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol (version 5.0 on 7 April 2023) was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05733208.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Ischemic Preconditioning , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Ischemic Preconditioning/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning/methods , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Prognosis , Research Design , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
2.
J Physiol ; 600(6): 1339-1355, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239189

ABSTRACT

Regular exercise training has potent and powerful protective effects against the development of cardiovascular disease. These cardioprotective effects of regular exercise training are partly explained through the effects of exercise on traditional cardiovascular risk factors and improvement in cardiac and vascular health, which take several weeks to months to develop. This review focuses on the observation that single bouts of exercise may also possess an underrecognized, clinically useful form of immediate cardioprotection. Studies, performed in both animals and humans, demonstrate that single or short-term exercise-induced protection (SEP) attenuates the magnitude of cardiac and/or vascular damage in response to prolonged ischaemia and reperfusion injury. This review highlights preclinical evidence supporting the hypothesis that SEP activates multiple pathways to confer immediate protection against ischaemic events, reduce the severity of potentially lethal ischaemic myocardial injury, and therefore act as a physiological first line of defence against injury. Given the fact that the extent of SEP could be modulated by exercise-related and subject-related factors, it is important to recognize and consider these factors to optimize future clinical implications of SEP. This review also summarizes potential effector signalling pathways (i.e. communication between exercising muscles to vascular/cardiac tissue) and intracellular pathways (i.e. reducing tissue damage) that ultimately confer protection against cardiac and vascular injury. Finally, we discuss potential future directions for designing adequate human and animal studies that will support developing effective SEP strategies for the (multi-)diseased and aged individual. KEY POINTS: Single or short-term exercise-induced protection (SEP) attenuates the magnitude of cardiac and/or vascular damage in response to prolonged ischaemia and reperfusion injury (IR injury). SEP activates multiple pathways to confer cardiac protection, which develops remotely at the site of the activated muscle by release of circulating molecules, which transfer towards activation of intramyocardial signalling that promotes cell survival during episodes of IR injury. SEP represents an attractive intervention in aged individuals and in those with co-morbidities. The immediate protection, low cost and simplicity to increase the 'dose' of SEP offers unique opportunities in the clinical applications of SEP.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury , Animals , Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena , Exercise/physiology , Heart , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/metabolism
3.
Pharmacol Res ; 170: 105715, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34111564

ABSTRACT

The relevance of extracellular vesicles (EV) as mediators of cardiac damage or recovery upon Ischemia Reperfusion Injury (IRI) and Remote Ischemic PreConditioning (RIPC) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether serum-derived EV, recovered from patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and subjected to the RIPC or sham procedures, may be a suitable therapeutic approach to prevent IRI during Percutaneous-Coronary-Intervention (PCI). A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study (NCT02195726) has been extended, and EV were recovered from 30 patients who were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo the RIPC- (EV-RIPC) or sham-procedures (EV-naive) before PCI. Patient-derived EV were analyzed by TEM, FACS and western blot. We found that troponin (TnT) was enriched in EV, compared to healthy subjects, regardless of diagnosis. EV-naive induced protection against IRI, both in-vitro and in the rat heart, unlike EV-RIPC. We noticed that EV-naive led to STAT-3 phosphorylation, while EV-RIPC to Erk-1/2 activation in the rat heart. Pre-treatment of the rat heart with specific STAT-3 and Erk-1/2 inhibitors led us to demonstrate that STAT-3 is crucial for EV-naive-mediated protection. In the same model, Erk-1/2 inhibition rescued STAT-3 activation and protection upon EV-RIPC treatment. 84 Human Cardiovascular Disease mRNAs were screened and DUSP6 mRNA was found enriched in patient-derived EV-naive. Indeed, DUSP6 silencing in EV-naive prevented STAT-3 phosphorylation and cardio-protection in the rat heart. This analysis of ACS-patients' EV proved: (i) EV-naive cardio-protective activity and mechanism of action; (ii) the lack of EV-RIPC-mediated cardio-protection; (iii) the properness of the in-vitro assay to predict EV effectiveness in-vivo.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Arm/blood supply , Extracellular Vesicles/transplantation , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Acute Coronary Syndrome/blood , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Aged , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Cell Line , Disease Models, Animal , Double-Blind Method , Dual Specificity Phosphatase 6/metabolism , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/metabolism , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Female , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/diagnosis , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/metabolism , Myocytes, Cardiac/pathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Phosphorylation , Rats, Wistar , Regional Blood Flow , STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 25(6): 487-493, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32597205

ABSTRACT

Translation of the cardioprotective effect by pharmacological and mechanical conditioning therapies into improvement of clinical outcome for the patients has been disappointing. Confounding factors like comorbidity and comedications may explain some of the loss in translation. However, the substantial improvement of outcome in disease states involving ischemia-reperfusion injury, that is, planned cardiac surgery, elective percutaneous coronary intervention, and even primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), is the most plausible explanation for the missed demonstration of a clinical benefit. Remote ischemic conditioning has demonstrated consistent cardioprotective effect in experimental and in clinical proof-of-concept studies. As an adjunctive cardioprotective treatment beyond reperfusion, remote ischemic conditioning should address target populations at risk of extensive tissue damage, including patients who experience complications, which may induce profound myocardial ischemia in relation to cardiac surgery or elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, patients with STEMI and predictable impaired clinical outcome due to delayed hospital admission, high Killip class, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest remain target groups. For high-risk patients, daily remote ischemic conditioning or the corollary of blood flow-restricted exercise may be alternative cardioprotective options during postoperative and post-myocardial infarct rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Ischemic Postconditioning , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Animals , Humans , Ischemic Postconditioning/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/diagnosis , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Protective Factors , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 46(4): 483-494, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31509904

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to establish the effect of combined therapy with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy and verapamil, amlodipine or nicorandil on functional recovery and oxidative stress markers after ischemia in the isolated rat heart. The study included 48 rats (Wistar albino, male gender, eight weeks old, body weight 200±50g). All animals were exposed to HBO2 treatment over 14 days. Isolated heart rats were perfused by the Langendorff retrograde method at a constant coronary pressure of 70 cm H2O. After stabilization period the hearts were divided into the following groups: HBO2 group (animals exposed to only HBO2 preconditioning); HBO2 + verapamil; HBO2 + amlodipine; andHBO2 + nicorandil (animals pretreated with HBO2 and appropriate pharmacological agent). Afterward, the hearts in all groups were subjected to 20-minute global ischemia and 30-minute reperfusion. Parameters of heart function were registered, including maximum and minimum rate of pressure development, systolic and diastolic left ventricular pressure, heart rate and coronary flow. Levels of pro-oxidants such as index of lipid peroxidation, measured as thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, nitrites, levels of superoxide anion radicals and hydrogen peroxide were determined in coronary venous effluent. Changes in cardiac tissue were evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Obtained results clearly indicate that blockage of calcium channel or the activation of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) in combination with HBO2 prevented ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac deleterious effects, thus contributing to improvement of functional recovery of the heart. However, future studies are certainly necessary for better understanding the mechanisms through which combination of these two maneuvers of preconditioning triggers cardioprotection.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Potassium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Animals , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Coronary Circulation , Heart , Heart Rate/drug effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Lipid Peroxidation , Male , Myocardium/pathology , Nicorandil/therapeutic use , Oxidative Stress , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Recovery of Function , Verapamil/therapeutic use
6.
Circ Res ; 124(10): 1482-1491, 2019 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30929570

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) or ischemic postconditioning (PostC) may protect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether combined intrahospital RIC and PostC or PostC alone in addition to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduce long-term clinical events after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study is a post hoc analysis of a prospective trial which randomized 696 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with symptoms <12 hours 1:1:1 to either combined RIC and PostC in addition to primary PCI, PostC alone in addition to primary PCI, or conventional PCI (control). Three cycles of RIC were performed by inflation of an upper arm blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes followed by deflation for 5 minutes. PostC was performed after primary PCI via 4 cycles of 30 seconds balloon occlusions followed by 30 seconds of reperfusion. Major adverse cardiac events consisting of cardiac death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure were assessed during long-term follow-up. Follow-up data were obtained in 97% of patients in median 3.6 years after the index event (interquartile range, 2.9-4.2 years). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 10.2% of patients in the combined RIC and PostC group and in 16.9% in the control group (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.97; P=0.04). The difference was driven by a significantly reduced rate of new congestive heart failure in the RIC and PostC group (2.7% versus 7.8%; odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.84; P=0.02). In contrast, PostC alone did not reduce major adverse cardiac events compared with controls (14.1% versus 16.9%; odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.48-1.35; P=0.41), and the reduction of new congestive heart failure was not statistically significant (3.5% versus 7.8%; odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.18-1.03; P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardioprotection by combined intrahospital RIC and PostC in addition to primary PCI significantly reduced the rate of major adverse cardiac events and new congestive heart failure after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02158468.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/prevention & control , Ischemic Postconditioning/methods , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Ischemic Postconditioning/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , Treatment Outcome
7.
Cardiovasc Res ; 115(7): 1167-1177, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30796814

ABSTRACT

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the heart failure (HF) that often complicates this condition, are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. To reduce myocardial infarct (MI) size and prevent heart failure, novel therapies are required to protect the heart against the detrimental effects of acute ischaemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). In this regard, targeting cardiac innervation may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for cardioprotection. A number of cardiac neural pathways mediate the beneficial effects of cardioprotective strategies such as ischaemic preconditioning and remote ischaemic conditioning, and nerve stimulation may therefore provide a novel therapeutic strategy for cardioprotection. In this article, we provide an overview of cardiac innervation and its impact on acute myocardial IRI, the role of extrinsic and intrinsic cardiac neural pathways in cardioprotection, and highlight peripheral and central nerve stimulation as a cardioprotective strategy with therapeutic potential for reducing MI size and preventing HF following AMI. This article is part of a Cardiovascular Research Spotlight Issue entitled 'Cardioprotection Beyond the Cardiomyocyte', and emerged as part of the discussions of the European Union (EU)-CARDIOPROTECTION Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action, CA16225.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/prevention & control , Heart/innervation , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Animals , Heart Failure/metabolism , Heart Failure/pathology , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/metabolism , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/metabolism , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/pathology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/adverse effects
8.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 55(5): 905-912, 2019 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30544237

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This trial was designed and patients were recruited at a time when the benefits of remote ischaemic preconditioning during open-heart surgery were still controversial. We focused on a homogeneous patient population undergoing either isolated aortic valve replacement or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery by investigating cardiac injury, metabolic stress and inflammatory response. METHODS: A 2-centre randomized controlled trial recruited a total of 124 patients between February 2013 and April 2015. Of them, 64 patients underwent CABG and 60 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were randomized to either sham or preconditioning. Remote ischaemic preconditioning was applied following anaesthesia and before sternotomy. Myocardial injury and inflammatory response were assessed by serially measuring cardiac troponin I, and interleukin-6, 8, 10 and the tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α). Biopsies from the left and the right ventricles were harvested after ischaemic reperfusion injury for nucleotides analysis. RESULTS: Application of remote ischaemic preconditioning did not alter the degree of troponin I release, levels of inflammatory markers and cardiac energetics in both the CABG and the aortic valve replacement groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preconditioning did not confer any additional cardioprotection in terms of reducing the levels of troponin I and inflammatory markers and preserving left and right ventricle energy metabolites in patients undergoing isolated CABG or aortic valve surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry ID 33084113 (doi: 10.1186/ISRCTN33084113) and UK controlled randomized trial number (UKCRN) registry ID 13672.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/surgery , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Cytokines/blood , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Inflammation , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Troponin I/blood
9.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(7)2018 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29581218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been suggested to protect against certain forms of organ injury after cardiac surgery. Previously, we reported the main results of RIPHeart (Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery) Study, a multicenter trial randomizing 1403 cardiac surgery patients receiving either RIPC or sham-RIPC. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this follow-up paper, we present 1-year follow-up of the composite primary end point and its individual components (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and acute renal failure), in a sub-group of patients, intraoperative myocardial dysfunction assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction 5 to 7 days and 3 months after surgery. RIPC neither showed any beneficial effect on the 1-year composite primary end point (RIPC versus sham-RIPC 16.4% versus 16.9%) and its individual components (all-cause mortality [3.4% versus 2.5%], myocardial infarction [7.0% versus 9.4%], stroke [2.2% versus 3.1%], acute renal failure [7.0% versus 5.7%]) nor improved intraoperative myocardial dysfunction or incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction 5 to 7 days (67 [47.5%] versus 71 [53.8%] patients) and 3 months after surgery (17 [27.9%] versus 18 [27.7%] patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to our main study, RIPC had no effect on intraoperative myocardial dysfunction, neurocognitive function and long-term outcome in cardiac surgery patients undergoing propofol anesthesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01067703.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cognition , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/epidemiology , Neurocognitive Disorders/epidemiology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/mortality , Double-Blind Method , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Neurocognitive Disorders/diagnosis , Neurocognitive Disorders/prevention & control , Neurocognitive Disorders/psychology , Neuropsychological Tests , Propofol/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 16(1): 71, 2017 05 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569217

ABSTRACT

Mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of ischemia/reperfusion injury are particularly complex, multifactorial and highly interconnected. A complex and entangled interaction is also emerging between platelet function, antiplatelet drugs, coronary diseases and ischemia/reperfusion injury, especially in diabetic conditions. Here we briefly summarize features of antiplatelet therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We also treat the influence of T2DM on ischemia/reperfusion injury and how anti-platelet therapies affect post-ischemic myocardial damage through pleiotropic properties not related to their anti-aggregating effects. miRNA-based signature associated with T2DM and its cardiovascular disease complications are also briefly considered. Influence of anti-platelet therapies and different effects of healthy and diabetic platelets on ischemia/reperfusion injury need to be further clarified in order to enhance patient benefits from antiplatelet therapy and revascularization. Here we provide insight on the difficulty to reduce the cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients and report novel information on the cardioprotective role of widely used anti-aggregant drugs.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/therapeutic use , Blood Platelets/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Myocardium/metabolism , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Aspirin/adverse effects , Blood Platelets/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Drug Resistance , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/blood , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/pathology , Myocardium/pathology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 22(5): 408-413, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28631504

ABSTRACT

Although remote ischemic conditioning promises significant benefit to patients with a variety of acute and chronic illnesses, development of automated, clinically applicable devices has been slow. At least 3 small companies have launched efforts to develop useful tools intended for sale in European and North American markets. The market challenges and opportunities linked to the development of a cost-effective, reliable, and clinically effective device for the application of remote ischemic conditioning are presented in this article.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/instrumentation , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/economics
12.
PLoS One ; 12(4): e0174588, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28380047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diseased human myocardium is highly susceptible to ischemia/reoxygenation (I/R)-induced injury but its response to protective interventions such as ischemic preconditioning (IPreC) is unclear. Cardiac and other pre-existing clinical conditions as well as previous or ongoing medical treatment may influence the myocardial response to I/R injury and protection. This study investigated the effect of both on myocardial susceptibility to I/R-induced injury and the protective effects of IPreC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial myocardium from cardiac surgery patients (n = 300) was assigned to one of three groups: aerobic control, I/R alone, and IPreC. Lactate dehydrogenase leakage, as a marker of cell injury, and cell viability were measured. The basal redox status was determined in samples from 90 patients. The response to I/R varied widely. Myocardium from patients with aortic valve disease was the most susceptible to injury whereas myocardium from dyslipidemia patients was the least susceptible. Tissue from females was better protected than tissue from males. Myocardium from patients with mitral valve disease was the least responsive to IPreC. The basal redox status was altered in the myocardium from patients with mitral and aortic valve disease. CONCLUSIONS: The response of the myocardium to I/R and IPreC is highly variable and influenced by the underlying cardiac pathology, dyslipidemia, sex, and the basal redox status. These results should be taken into account in the design of future clinical studies on the prevention of I/R injury and protection.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/complications , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/complications , Aged , Catalase/metabolism , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/complications , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Male , Myocardial Ischemia/metabolism , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/metabolism , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/therapy , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Oxidation-Reduction , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Superoxide Dismutase/metabolism , Superoxides/metabolism
13.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 31(1): 53-61, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27714476

ABSTRACT

The size of the myocardial infarction remains an important therapeutic target, because heart attack size correlates with mortality and heart failure. In this era, myocardial infarct size is reduced primarily by timely reperfusion of the infarct related coronary artery. Whereas numerous pre-clinical studies have shown that certain pharmacologic agents and therapeutic maneuvers reduce myocardial infarction size greater than reperfusion alone, very few of these therapies have translated to successful clinical trials or standard clinical use. In this review we discuss both the recent successes as well as recent disappointments, and describe some of the newer potential therapies from the preclinical literature that have not yet been tested in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion/methods , Myocardium/pathology , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Animals , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Reperfusion/adverse effects , Translational Research, Biomedical , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 21(2): 219-21, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26740183

ABSTRACT

This editorial describes benefits and limitations of remote ischemic conditioning. Remote ischemic conditioning was shown to reduce myocardial intact size in at least 4 sizeable clinical trials of acute myocardial infarction. It was not effective in recent studies of cardiac surgery. Reasons for these differences are discussed.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/diagnosis , Risk Assessment
16.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 49(5): 1403-10, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26464453

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Sildenafil has strong cardiac preconditioning properties in animal studies and has a safe side-effect profile in children. Therefore, we evaluated the application of Sildenafil preconditioning to reduce myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury in children undergoing surgical ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind study. Children (1-17 years) undergoing VSD closure were randomized into three groups: placebo (Control group), preconditioning with 0.06 mg/kg (Sild-L group) and 0.6 mg/kg Sildenafil (Sild-H group). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: troponin release. CK-MB, Troponin I, inflammatory response (IL-6 and TNF-α), bypass and ventilation weaning times, inotropy score and echocardiographic function were assessed. Data expressed as median (range), and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were studied (13/group). Aortic cross-clamp time was similar [27 (18-85) and 27 (12-39) min] in the Control and Sild-L groups, respectively, but significantly longer [39 (20-96) min] in the Sild-H group when compared with the Control group. Area under the curve of CK-MB release was 1105 (620-1855) h ng/ml in the Control group, 1672 (564-2767) h ng/ml in the Sild-L group and was significantly higher in the Sild-H group [1695 (1252-3377) h ng/ml] when compared with the Control group. There were no significant differences in inflammatory response markers, cardiopulmonary bypass and ventilation weaning times, inotropy scores and echocardiographic function between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, Sildenafil failed to reduce myocardial injury in children undergoing cardiac surgery, nor does it alter cardiac function, inotropic needs or postoperative course. A subclinical increase in cardiac enzyme release after Sildenafil preconditioning cannot be excluded. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: CTRI/2014/03/004468.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Sildenafil Citrate/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/mortality , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Heart/drug effects , Heart/physiopathology , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Infant , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/mortality , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/statistics & numerical data , Male , Sildenafil Citrate/administration & dosage , Sildenafil Citrate/pharmacology
17.
Klin Med (Mosk) ; 93(3): 14-20, 2015.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26168598

ABSTRACT

The comprehensive analysis of efficiency of different variants of preconditioning is currently of special importance since the realization of the potential of endogenous protective effects extends possibilities for anti-ischemic protection of myocardium at different stages of CHD. Today, the main principles of preconditioning are purposefully applied to the development of therapeutic strategies for the treatment of CHD. The most widely used in the clinical practice are local and distant preconditioning modalities as well as preconditioning by physical exercises whose well-known protective effects are used in cardiosurgery and routine clinical practice. Elaboration of rehabilitative and preventive programs taking account of vaso- and cardioprotective effects of preconditioning may significantly increase the effectiveness of the rehabilitative treatment of CHD patients with poor organic coronary and myocardial reserve.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Coronary Disease , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Coronary Circulation , Coronary Disease/pathology , Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Coronary Disease/therapy , Heart/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Myocardium/pathology , Treatment Outcome
18.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 16(2): 101-8, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25681256

ABSTRACT

Myocardial reperfusion injury has been identified as a key determinant of myocardial infarct size in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical interventions. Although the molecular mechanisms underpinning reperfusion injury have been elucidated, attempts at translating this understanding into clinical benefit for patients undergoing cardiac interventions have produced mixed results. Ischemic conditioning has been applied before, during, or after an ischemic insult to the myocardium and has taken the form of local induction of ischemia or ischemia of distant tissues. Clinical studies have confirmed the safety of differing conditioning techniques, but the benefit of such techniques in reducing hard clinical event rates has produced mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the role of ischemic conditioning in patients undergoing percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Male , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Needs Assessment , Patient Safety , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
19.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 8(1 Pt B): 178-188, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25240548

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) initiated prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) could reduce myocardial infarct (MI) size in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: RIC, using transient limb ischemia and reperfusion, can protect the heart against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. Whether RIC can reduce MI size, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned 197 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 0 to receive RIC (four 5-min cycles of upper arm cuff inflation/deflation) or control (uninflated cuff placed on upper arm for 40 min) protocols prior to PPCI. The primary study endpoint was MI size, measured by CMR in 83 subjects on days 3 to 6 after admission. RESULTS: RIC reduced MI size by 27%, when compared with the MI size of control subjects (18.0 ± 10% [n = 40] vs. 24.5 ± 12.0% [n = 43]; p = 0.009). At 24 h, high-sensitivity troponin T was lower with RIC (2,296 ± 263 ng/l [n = 89] vs. 2,736 ± 325 ng/l [n = 84]; p = 0.037). RIC also reduced the extent of myocardial edema measured by T2-mapping CMR (28.5 ± 9.0% vs. 35.1 ± 10.0%; p = 0.003) and lowered mean T2 values (68.7 ± 5.8 ms vs. 73.1 ± 6.1 ms; p = 0.001), precluding the use of CMR edema imaging to correctly estimate the area at risk. Using CMR-independent coronary angiography jeopardy scores to estimate the area at risk, RIC, when compared with the control protocol, was found to significantly improve the myocardial salvage index (0.42 ± 0.29 vs. 0.28 ± 0.29; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized study demonstrated that in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by PPCI, RIC, initiated prior to PPCI, reduced MI size, increased myocardial salvage, and reduced myocardial edema.


Subject(s)
Edema, Cardiac/prevention & control , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Upper Extremity/blood supply , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Coronary Angiography , Edema, Cardiac/blood , Edema, Cardiac/diagnosis , Edema, Cardiac/etiology , England , Female , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/blood , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardium/pathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Troponin T/blood
20.
J Nippon Med Sch ; 80(5): 328-41, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24189351

ABSTRACT

"Depolarized arrest", induced by hyperkalemic (moderately increased extracellular potassium) cardioplegia is the gold standard to achieve elective temporary cardiac arrest in cardiac surgery. Hyperkalemic cardioplegic solutions provide good myocardial protection, which is relatively safe and easily and rapidly reversible. However, this technique has detrimental effects associated with ionic imbalance involving sodium and calcium overload of the cardiac cell induced by depolarization of the cell membrane. Hence, the development of an improved cardioplegic solution that enhances myocardial protection would be expected as an alternative to hyperkalemic cardioplegia. In this review, we assess the potential disadvantages of "depolarized arrest" and the suitability and clinical potential of "non-depolarized arrest". "Magnesium cardioplegia" and "esmolol cardioplegia" has been shown to exert superior protection with comparable safety profiles to that of hyperkalemic cardioplegia. These alternative techniques require further examination and investigation to challenge the traditional view that hyperkalemic arrest is best. Endogenous cardioprotective strategies, termed "ischemic preconditioning" and "ischemic postconditioning", may have a role in cardiac surgery to provide additional protection. The elective nature of cardiac surgery, with the known onset of ischemia and reperfusion, lends it to the potential of these strategies. However, the benefit of preconditioning and postconditioning during cardiac surgery is controversial, particularly in the context of cardioplegia. The clinical application of these strategies is unlikely to become routine during cardiac surgery because of the necessity for repeated aortic crossclamping with consequent potential for embolic events, but offers considerable potential especially if "pharmacological" preconditioning and postconditioning could be established.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cardioplegic Solutions/therapeutic use , Heart Arrest, Induced , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Animals , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/trends , Cardioplegic Solutions/adverse effects , Forecasting , Heart Arrest, Induced/adverse effects , Heart Arrest, Induced/methods , Heart Arrest, Induced/trends , Humans , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/adverse effects , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/methods , Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial/trends , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...